Cough
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 ResearchThe description of cough sounds by healthcare professionalsJaclyn A Smith1 , H Louise Ashurst2 , Sandy Jack2 , Ashley A Woodcock1 and John E Earis2  1
North West Lung Research Centre, South Manchester Hospitals University Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Rd, Manchester, M16 0DR, UK 2
Aintree Chest Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, Merseyside L9 7AL, UK author email corresponding author email
Cough 2006,
2:1doi:10.1186/1745-9974-2-1
|
| Published: |
25 January 2006 |
Abstract
Background
Little is known of the language healthcare professionals use to describe cough sounds. We aimed to examine how they describe cough sounds and to assess whether these descriptions suggested they appreciate the basic sound qualities (as assessed by acoustic analysis) and the underlying diagnosis of the patient coughing.
Methods
53 health professionals from two large respiratory tertiary referral centres were recruited; 22 doctors and 31 staff from professions allied to medicine. Participants listened to 9 sequences of spontaneous cough sounds from common respiratory diseases. For each cough they selected patient gender, the most appropriate descriptors and a diagnosis. Cluster analysis was performed to assess which cough sounds attracted similar descriptions.
Results
Gender was correctly identified in 93% of cases. The presence or absence of mucus was correct in 76.1% and wheeze in 39.3% of cases. However, identifying clinical diagnosis from cough was poor at 34.0%. Cluster analysis showed coughs with the same acoustics properties rather than the same diagnoses attracted the same descriptions.
Conclusion
These results suggest that healthcare professionals can recognise some of the qualities of cough sounds but are poor at making diagnoses from them. It remains to be seen whether in the future cough sound acoustics will provide useful clinical information and whether their study will lead to the development of useful new outcome measures in cough monitoring. |