<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Cough - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Cough</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/6/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/4" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/6/1/1">
        <title>Perception of urge-to-cough and dyspnea in healthy smokers with decreased cough reflex sensitivity</title>
        <description>Background:
Although cigarette smoking has been implicated as an important risk factor for the development of respiratory symptoms, the perceptional aspects of two symptoms in smokers have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, we simultaneously evaluated the cough reflex sensitivity, the cognition of urge-to-cough and perception of dyspnea in both healthy smokers and non-smokers.
Methods:
Fourteen male healthy never-smokers and 14 age-matched male healthy current-smokers were recruited via public postings. The cough reflex sensitivity and the urge-to-cough were evaluated by the inhalation of citric acid. The perception of dyspnea was evaluated by Borg scores during applications of external inspiratory resistive loads.
Results:
The cough reflex threshold to citric acid, as expressed by the lowest concentration of citric acid that elicited two or more coughs (C2) and the lowest concentration of citric acid that elicited five or more coughs (C5) in smokers was significantly higher than in non-smokers. The urge-to-cough log-log slope in smokers was significantly milder than that of non-smokers. There were no significant differences in the urge-to-cough threshold between non-smokers and smokers. There were no significant differences in perceptions of dyspnea between non-smokers and smokers.
Conclusions:
The study showed that decreased cough reflex sensitivity in healthy smokers was accompanied by a decreased cognition of urge-to-cough whereas it was not accompanied by the alternation of perception of dyspnea. Physicians should pay attention to the perceptual alterations of cough in smokers.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/6/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Masashi Kanezaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Satoru Ebihara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Etsuhiro Nikkuni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peijun Gui</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chihiro Suda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Takae Ebihara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Miyako Yamasaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masahiro Kohzuki</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2010, 6:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-6-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/12">
        <title>Spatiotemporal regulation of the cough motor pattern</title>
        <description>The purpose of this study was to identify the spatiotemporal determinants of the cough motor pattern. We speculated that the spatial and temporal characteristics of the cough motor pattern would be regulated separately. Electromyograms (EMG) of abdominal muscles (ABD, rectus abdominis or transversus abdominis), and parasternal muscles (PS) were recorded in anesthetized cats. Repetitive coughing was produced by mechanical stimulation of the lumen of the intrathoracic trachea. Cough inspiratory (CTI) and expiratory (CTE) durations were obtained from the PS EMG. The ABD EMG burst was confined to the early part of CTE and was followed by a quiescent period of varying duration. As such, CTE was divided into two segments with CTE1 defined as the duration of the ABD EMG burst and CTE2 defined as the period of little or no EMG activity in the ABD EMG. Total cough cycle duration (CTTOT) was strongly correlated with CTE2 (r2&gt;0.8), weakly correlated with CTI (r2&lt;0.3), and not correlated with CTE1 (r2&lt;0.2). There was no significant relationship between CTI and CTE1 or CTE2. The magnitudes of inspiratory and expiratory motor drive during cough were only weakly correlated with each other (r2&lt;0.36) and were not correlated with the duration of any phase of cough. The results support: a) separate regulation of CTI and CTE, b) two distinct subphases of CTE (CTE1 and CTE2), c) the duration of CTE2 is a primary determinant of CTTOT, and d) separate regulation of the magnitude and temporal features of the cough motor pattern.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Cheng Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sourish Saha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melanie Rose</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Davenport</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald Bolser</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/11">
        <title>Acute cough: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge</title>
        <description>Background:
Acute cough is one of the most common complaints prompting patient visits to healthcare professionals. Despite the broad repercussions of acute cough on patient quality of life, school and work productivity, and public health resources, research on this condition is minimal, as are the available treatment options. Many patients use over-the-counter medicines, which are often ineffective for symptom relief. Some therapies may achieve antitussive activity, but at the expense of unpleasant or intolerable side effects.Unmet needsWhen considering the treatments currently available for the management of acute cough, the multiple limitations of such treatments are quite apparent. Most of these treatments lack clinically proven efficacy and reliability to support their use. This reinforces the need for the generation of quality scientific data from well-performed clinical trials. Hopefully, the result will be the development of safer, more effective and more reliable therapeutic options in the management of acute cough.Cough assessment and managementAcute cough can be due to a variety of causes, and it is worthwhile to consider these pathogenic factors in some detail. It is also important to be familiar with the effects that acute cough has on patients&apos; quality of life, work productivity, and the healthcare system; proper awareness of these effects may contribute to better understanding of the social impact of cough. In reference to the available treatments for the management of acute cough, adequate knowledge of the type of over-the-counter and prescription products in the market, as well as their mode of action and advantages/disadvantages, may provide expanded pharmacotherapeutic opportunities and facilitate better clinical decisions. However, due to the drawbacks of current treatment options, ideas for future cough management and newer products need to be considered and tested.
Conclusion:
In view of the socio-economic impact of acute cough and the limitations of available treatments, a renewed interest in the management of acute cough needs to be encouraged. The current strategies for acute cough management need to be reassessed, with a focus on developing new, reliable products and formulations with proven efficacy and safety.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Peter Dicpinigaitis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gene Colice</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Jo Goolsby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Rogg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sheldon Spector</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Birgit Winther</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/10">
        <title>Associations of physical and mental health problems with chronic cough in a representative population cohort.</title>
        <description>Background:
Although chronic cough is a common problem in clinical practice, data on the prevalence and characteristics of cough in the general population are scarce. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of chronic cough that is not associated with diagnosed respiratory conditions and examine the impact on health status and psychological health, in a representative adult population cohort
Methods:
North West Adelaide Health Study (n stage 1 = 4060, stage 2 = 3160) is a representative population adult cohort. Clinical assessment included spirometry, anthropometry and skin tests. Questionnaires assessed demographics, lifestyle risk factors, quality of life, mental health and respiratory symptoms, doctor diagnosed conditions and medication use.
Results:
Of the 3355 people without identified lung disease at baseline, 18.2% reported chronic cough. In multiple logistic regression models, at follow-up, dry chronic cough without sputum production was significantly more common in males (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9), current smokers (OR 4.9, 95% CI 3.4, 7.2), obesity (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3, 2.9), use of ACE inhibitors (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1, 2.9), severe mental health disturbance (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4, 3.1) and older age (40-59 years OR 1.7 95% CI 1.2, 2.4; &#8805; 60 years OR 2.1 95% CI 1.3, 3.5). Among non-smokers only, all cough was significantly more common in men, those with severe mental health disturbance and obesity.
Conclusions:
Chronic cough is a major cause of morbidity. Attention to cough is indicated in patients with obesity, psychological symptoms or smokers. Inquiring about cough in those with mental health problems may identify reversible morbidity.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Robert Adams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Appleton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Taylor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Ruffin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/9">
        <title>Bronchodilator effect of deep inspiration and bronchoconstriction-triggered cough</title>
        <description>Background:
Cough in the patients with cough variant asthma is triggered by bronchoconstriction, which responds to bronchodilator therapy. Following airway narrowing induced by inhaled methacholine, deep inspiration (DI) causes dilation of the airways in both asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between bronchodilator effect of DI and bronchoconstriction-triggered cough.
Methods:
We measured airway responsiveness to methacholine using partial and full flow-volume curves in 28 healthy adults. The expiratory flow at 40% above residual volume from the full forced vital capacity (MEF40) was obtained and the volume was used as the reference volume to determine the isovolume flow from the partial curve (PEF40). Coughs were counted for 32 min during and following the inhalation of methacholine at the provocative concentration which produced a 20% fall or more in FEV1from the post-saline value (PC20-FEV1). The bronchodilator effect of DI on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine at the PC20-FEV1 concentration was expressed as the ratio of (MEF40-PEF40)/PEF40 (DI index).
Results:
The number of coughs for 32 min during and following the inhalation of PC20-FEV1 concentration of methacholine was 39.3 &#177; 29.7 (mean &#177; SD)/32 min. The number of coughs during and following the inhalation was correlated with DI index (r = 0.57, p = 0.0015), but not with PC20-FEV1 or change in FEV1 or PEF40 by inhalation of the PC20-FEV1 concentration of methacholine.
Conclusion:
We found that methacholine-induced cough was associated with the bronchodilator effect of DI on methacholine induced-bronchoconstriction in normal subjects.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Noriyuki Ohkura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masaki Fujimura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akira Tokuda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johsuke Hara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akihiro Hori</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masaru Nishitsuji</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Miki Abo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nobuyuki Katayama</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/8">
        <title>Classification of voluntary cough sound and airflow patterns for detecting abnormal pulmonary function</title>
        <description>Background:
Involuntary cough is a classic symptom of many respiratory diseases. The act of coughing serves a variety of functions such as clearing the airways in response to respiratory irritants or aspiration of foreign materials. It has been pointed out that a cough results in substantial stresses on the body which makes voluntary cough a useful tool in physical diagnosis.
Methods:
In the present study, fifty-two normal subjects and sixty subjects with either obstructive or restrictive lung disorders were asked to perform three individual voluntary coughs. The objective of the study was to evaluate if the airflow and sound characteristics of a voluntary cough could be used to distinguish between normal subjects and subjects with lung disease. This was done by extracting a variety of features from both the cough airflow and acoustic characteristics and then using a classifier that applied a reconstruction algorithm based on principal component analysis.
Results:
Results showed that the proposed method for analyzing voluntary coughs was capable of achieving an overall classification performance of 94% and 97% for identifying abnormal lung physiology in female and male subjects, respectively. An ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the cough parameter analysis methods were equal at 98% and 98% respectively, for the same groups of subjects.
Conclusion:
A novel system for classifying coughs has been developed. This automated classification system is capable of accurately detecting abnormal lung function based on the combination of the airflow and acoustic properties of voluntary cough.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Ayman Abaza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeremy Day</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeffrey Reynolds</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmed Mahmoud</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>W Goldsmith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Walter McKinney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>E Petsonk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Frazer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Changes in health-related quality of life and clinical implications in Chinese patients with chronic cough</title>
        <description>Background:
Chronic cough has negative effects on quality of life. However, the changes in health-related quality of life and clinical implications remain unclear in Chinese patients with chronic cough.
Methods:
A standard Chinese version of Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) was developed by an established translation procedure and its repeatability was assessed in a preliminary study involving 20 untreated patients with stable chronic cough. The quality of life was measured with the Short form-36 health survey and compared between 110 patients with chronic cough and 90 healthy volunteers. The changes in health-related quality of life were evaluated in the patients with chronic cough with the LCQ just before the specific treatment was initiated and a week after the cough had resolved completely. Cough threshold with inhaled capsaicin, expressed as the lowest concentration of capsaicin required for the induction of &#8805;5 coughs, was also measured.
Results:
The repeatability of the Chinese version of the LCQ was validated at a four day interval with the intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.89-0.94 for total and domain score (n = 20). The scores of the Short form-36 health survey were significantly lower in patients with chronic cough than those in healthy volunteers. In general, there was no significant difference in overall quality of life between different causes of chronic cough or genders although embarrassment, frustration and sleep disturbance were more common in female patients, as indicated by the LCQ. However, the successful treatment of cough obviously increased the total scores of the LCQ from 14.2 &#177; 2.7 to 19.5 &#177; 1.9 (t = 13.7, P &lt; 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the total score of the LCQ and physical (r = 0.39, P &lt; 0.0001) or mental (r = 0.30, P &lt; 0.001) component summary of the Short form-36 health survey but not between the LCQ and capsaicin cough threshold.
Conclusion:
The quality of life is significantly impaired in Chinese patients with chronic cough. The Chinese version of the LCQ is a valid measure of cough related quality of life and is repeatable and responsive.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Wei Ma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Li Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yu Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xin Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hanjing Lu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zhongmin Qiu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/6">
        <title>Cough and dyspnea during bronchoconstriction: comparison of different stimuli</title>
        <description>Background:
Bronchial challenge tests are used to evaluate bronchial responsiveness in diagnosis and follow-up of asthmatic patients. Challenge induced cough has increasingly been recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool. Various stimuli and protocols have been employed. The aim of this study was to compare cough and dyspnea intensity induced by different stimuli.
Methods:
Twenty asthmatic patients underwent challenge tests with methacholine, bradykinin and exercise. Cough was counted during challenge tests. Dyspnea was assessed by modified Borg scale and visual analogue scale. Statistical comparisons were performed by linear mixed-effects model.
Results:
For cough evaluation, bradykinin was the most potent trigger (p &lt; 0.01). In terms of dyspnea measured by Borg scale, there were no differences among stimuli (p &gt; 0.05). By visual analogue scale, bradykinin induced more dyspnea than other stimuli (p &#8804; 0.04).
Conclusion:
Bradykinin seems to be the most suitable stimulus for bronchial challenge tests intended for measuring cough in association with bronchoconstriction.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Thais Suguikawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clecia Garcia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edson Martinez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elcio Vianna</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/5">
        <title>Measuring cough severity: perspectives from the literature and from patients with chronic cough</title>
        <description>Background:
In order to assess severity of cough from patients&apos; perspectives and capture the effects of treatment in clinical trials, a measurement tool must show evidence of validity and reliability. The purpose of this study was to characterize cough severity from patients&apos; perspectives as the initial step in the development of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for use in clinical trials.
Methods:
This focus groups study included patients with clinician confirmed chronic cough recruited from a large internal medicine clinic in the US. A semi-structured focus group guide was designed to elicit information about patients&apos; experiences with cough severity and their characterization of symptoms. The focus group data were coded to identify concepts and terminology of cough severity.
Results:
Three focus groups were conducted [n = 22; 6 male; mean age 66.1 (&#177; 12.9)]. Etiology included GERD, asthma, bronchitis, post-nasal drip, and other. Three domains of cough severity were identified: frequency, intensity, and disruption. In addition to a single cough, participants in all focus groups described coughing in uncontrollable paroxysms they called &quot;fits,&quot; &quot;bouts,&quot; &quot;spells,&quot; or &quot;episodes.&quot; The urge to cough, described as an important sign of impending cough, was considered a component of cough frequency. Participants also described daytime activity and nighttime sleep disruption as an indication of cough severity. Finally, participants described variability in cough severity.
Conclusion:
Results suggest that patients describe cough severity in terms of frequency, intensity, and disruptiveness, indicating these 3 domains should be addressed when evaluating cough severity and outcomes of treatment.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Margaret Vernon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nancy Kline Leidy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alise Nacson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Linda Nelsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Chronic cough and laryngeal dysfunction improve with specific treatment of cough and paradoxical vocal fold movement</title>
        <description>RationaleChronic persistent cough can be associated with laryngeal dysfunction that leads to symptoms such as dysphonia, sensory hyperresponsiveness to capsaicin, and motor dysfunction with paradoxical vocal fold movement and variable extrathoracic airflow obstruction (reduced inspiratory airflow). Successful therapy of chronic persistent cough improves symptoms and sensory hyperresponsiveness. The effects of treatment for chronic cough on laryngeal dysfunction are not known.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate effects of therapy for chronic cough and paradoxical vocal fold movement.
Methods:
Adults with chronic cough (n = 24) were assessed before and after treatment for chronic persistent cough by measuring quality of life, extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness to hypertonic saline provocation, capsaicin cough reflex hypersensitivity and fibreoptic laryngoscopy to observe paradoxical vocal fold movement. Subjects with chronic cough were classified into those with (n = 14) or without (n = 10) paradoxical vocal fold movement based on direct observation at laryngoscopy.
Results:
Following treatment there was a significant improvement in cough related quality of life and cough reflex sensitivity in both groups. Subjects with chronic cough and paradoxical vocal fold movement also had additional improvements in extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness and paradoxical vocal fold movement. The degree of improvement in cough reflex sensitivity correlated with the improvement in extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness.
Conclusion:
Laryngeal dysfunction is common in chronic persistent cough, where it is manifest as paradoxical vocal fold movement and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness. Successful treatment for chronic persistent cough leads to improvements in these features of laryngeal dysfunction.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Nicole Ryan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Vertigan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Gibson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
